How Scorecards Can Predict Everything from Loans to Pizza Toppings - And Why You Should Care!

Discover How the Scorecard Method Makes Data-Driven Decisions Easy and Transparent

Greetings, Data Enthusiasts! 🌟
Today, I want to introduce you to an amazing concept in data science called the "score-card method." I promise, this isn’t about those school report cards we all dreaded (mine always said "talks too much" anyway 😅).

Instead, we’re talking about a super handy tool that can help us make informed decisions—whether it’s approving a loan, ranking products, or prioritizing customers, the score-card method assigns a score to each observation based on its features. These scores can then be used to compare and rank entities for a specific decision-making process.

The method is widely used in financial services for credit scoring, but its applications go beyond that. It can be applied to any situation where consistent ranking and decision-making based on features are necessary.

---

When and Where to Use It?
The score-card method is pragmatic and versatile, like that one friend who can play the guitar, fix your car, and make the best pasta. Here are some scenarios where it can be used:

1. Product Ranking: E-commerce platforms use score-cards to identify top-performing products based on reviews, price, and sales.

2. Loan Applications: Lenders use score-cards to assess creditworthiness.

3. Customer Prioritization: Businesses rank customers based on their likelihood to purchase, enabling focused marketing strategies.

And it doesn’t end there!
The score-card method can be used for all sorts of things that require consistent decision-making based on data. Basically, if you need to rank or decide between anything, a score-card might be the answer!

---

Steps to Build a Score-Card

1. Data Preparation: Data is cleaned and filtered using var_filter to ensure valid features.

2. Train-Test Split: The dataset is split into training and testing sets.

3. WOE Binning: Bins are automatically created, converting continuous features into categories and calculating Weight of Evidence (WOE).

4. Logistic Regression: The logistic regression model is built using the WOE-transformed training data.

5. Performance Evaluation: ROC and KS performance metrics are generated to evaluate the model’s performance on both the training and test data.

   

6. Scale Coefficients to Create Scores
   Once you have the logistic regression model, you need to convert the coefficients into scores:

   • Score Scaling: Scale the coefficients so that each feature gets a score based on its impact. This score is typically easy to interpret (e.g., between 0 and 100).

   • Base Score: Determine a base score to start with, which can be adjusted up or down based on the characteristics of each observation.

7. Create the Scorecard
   Now that you have scores for each feature:

   • Combine Scores: For each observation (e.g., a loan applicant or a product), combine the scores from all relevant features to get an overall score.

8. PSI Evaluation: The Population Stability Index (PSI) is used to evaluate the stability of the score distributions across the datasets.

   

---

Some Statistics!

Did you really think you can get away with this! 😎

WOE Bins: Simplifying Predictions

Let’s talk about Weight of Evidence (WOE)—don’t worry, it’s not as scary as it sounds. WOE helps us determine how well a feature separates good outcomes from bad ones.

Imagine we want to predict whether someone will return a library book on time. Features like number of books borrowed and past lateness can be used.

WOE helps us know how each of these features "weights" into our decision—like, does the number of times they've been late in the past really predict their future lateness?

How Does WOE Work?
WOE tells us how different categories of a feature relate to an outcome (good or bad). We calculate WOE for each category by comparing the proportion of good vs. bad outcomes.

Here’s the formula:

\(\text{WOE} = \ln\left( \frac{\text{Proportion of Good Outcomes in Bin}}{\text{Proportion of Bad Outcomes in Bin}} \right) \)

In this formula:

• A "bin" is a group we’re analyzing—like splitting people by the number of days they’ve been late before (0-5 days, 6-10 days, etc.).

• "Good outcomes" could mean the person returns the book on time, and "bad outcomes" means they don’t.

The WOE value tells us whether a specific category of the feature is more or less likely to predict a good outcome. A positive WOE value means it leans towards "good," while a negative one indicates a greater likelihood of a "bad" outcome.

---

Let’s Bring It All Together with a real-world use case

Okay, let’s get practical with a fun example. Imagine we’re trying to rank products in a store based on their chances of becoming the next big hit! We’ll use some simple data, create WOE bins, and score them using a score-card approach.

The Dummy Data

1. Customer Ratings (out of 5 stars)

2. First Month Sales (number of units sold)

Our label (the outcome we want to predict) is Product Success (1 for success, 0 for failure)

Here’s how we can do this with Python and scorecardpy.

pip install scorecardpy
import scorecardpy as sc
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression

# Step 1: Create Dummy Data
np.random.seed(42)
data = pd.DataFrame({
    'customer_ratings': np.random.randint(1, 6, 100),  # Ratings between 1 and 5
    'first_month_sales': np.random.randint(10, 500, 100),  # Sales between 10 and 500
    'product_success': np.random.choice([0, 1], 100)  # Success (1) or failure (0)
})

# Step 2: Data Preparation
# Filter variables based on missing values, IV, and identical values
dt_s = sc.var_filter(data, y="product_success")

# Step 3: Train-test split
train, test = sc.split_df(dt_s, 'product_success').values()

# Step 4: WOE Binning
# Automatically binning and calculating WOE
bins = sc.woebin(dt_s, y="product_success")

# Optional: You can manually adjust the bins here if needed
# breaks_adj = {
#     'customer_ratings': [2, 4],
#     'first_month_sales': [100, 300, 400]
# }
# bins_adj = sc.woebin(dt_s, y="product_success", breaks_list=breaks_adj)
# For now, we proceed without manual adjustment
bins_adj = bins

# Step 5: Convert train and test sets to WOE values
train_woe = sc.woebin_ply(train, bins_adj)
test_woe = sc.woebin_ply(test, bins_adj)

# Separate features and target variable
y_train = train_woe.loc[:, 'product_success']
X_train = train_woe.loc[:, train_woe.columns != 'product_success']
y_test = test_woe.loc[:, 'product_success']
X_test = test_woe.loc[:, test_woe.columns != 'product_success']

# Step 6: Logistic Regression Model
lr = LogisticRegression(penalty='l1', C=0.9, solver='saga', n_jobs=-1)
lr.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Step 7: Predictions on Train and Test Data
train_pred = lr.predict_proba(X_train)[:, 1]
test_pred = lr.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]

# Step 8: Performance Evaluation (ROC and KS plots)
train_perf = sc.perf_eva(y_train, train_pred, title="Train Performance")
test_perf = sc.perf_eva(y_test, test_pred, title="Test Performance")

# Step 9: Scorecard Creation
card = sc.scorecard(bins_adj, lr, X_train.columns)

# Step 10: Calculate Credit Scores for Train and Test Sets
train_score = sc.scorecard_ply(train, card, print_step=0)
test_score = sc.scorecard_ply(test, card, print_step=0)

# Step 11: Population Stability Index (PSI) Evaluation
sc.perf_psi(
    score={'train': train_score, 'test': test_score},
    label={'train': y_train, 'test': y_test}
)

# Output the first few scores
print(train_score.head())
print(test_score.head())

What Do the Scores Mean?
Now each product has a score, and the higher the score, the more likely it is to succeed. This helps us rank products and decide which ones should get priority for things like marketing or shelf space.

For example, if you have a product with a high score, it's like it has "borrowed many books and always returned them on time." In other words, it’s trustworthy and likely to succeed!

---

When and Why would you prefer the Score-Card Method:

1. Ease of Interpretation: Scores are more user-friendly than probabilities, making decisions like "approve if score > 600" easy to understand.

2. Transparency: Scorecards clearly show how each factor contributes to the overall score, making decisions more explainable compared to opaque probability models.

3. Consistency: Scorecards provide stable decision thresholds, ensuring consistent outcomes, unlike probabilities which can vary between models.

4. Actionable Insights: Scores align well with business rules for decision-making, while probabilities need additional interpretation to define thresholds.

5. Regulatory Compliance: Scorecards are easier to audit and comply with regulatory requirements compared to complex, often "black box" probabilistic models.

In short, the score-card method is more interpretable, actionable, and consistent, making it ideal for practical decision-making, especially for non-technical stakeholders.

Thanks for reading, and remember: data science can be fun, and even simple scorecards can help us make sense of the chaotic world around us!✨